Against no treatment: relief for a few weeksEmerging evidence
Reviews of mostly small trials find cupping eases long-term neck, back and other muscle and joint pain more than no treatment or a waiting list. On paper the effect is large: in 18 trials of 1,172 people, pain fell a lot in the short term. Neck pain reviews of 18 trials and of 9 trials (401 people) agree, but a 2025 review across muscle and joint pain found pain eased while disability and mental health didn't improve.
People knew which treatment they had, most trials were at high risk of bias, and a map of 14 reviews found no high-quality evidence for any pain condition. Cochrane, which publishes the most rigorous reviews, has so far only published its plan (protocol) for a review of cupping for long-term low back pain.
Sources 1, 2, 25, 3, 26, 27, 28
Against sham cupping: little or no differenceEmerging evidence
When the comparison is a sham (cups with little or no suction), the benefit mostly disappears. Pooled across trials it wasn't significant, and a 2026 review of 5 sham-controlled trials (281 people) found the effect too uncertain to call, at very low certainty.
In 90 people with long-term low back pain, 8 weekly sessions changed pain by less than 1 point out of 10 compared with sham. In 141 people with fibromyalgia, cupping beat usual care by about 12 points out of 100 but sham by only 3, and the authors concluded it can't be recommended. In 62 women with knee arthritis, 12 sessions were no better than sham. In back pain, low-pressure cupping did about as well as the real thing.
Sources 1, 4, 5, 29, 30, 31, 32
Neck painEmerging evidence
In four trials from one research group, each with 50 people, cupping beat a waiting list or usual care for long-term neck pain: by about 22 points out of 100 after 5 sessions over 2 weeks, by about 18 points 3 days after a single session, and by about 11 points after 5 cupping massages. With a pulsating cupping device, diary pain fell from about 4 to under 3 out of 10, while it stayed at about 4 with usual care. In these trials, the smallest change people noticed was about 8 points out of 100.
Cupping massage given at home by a partner twice a week for 12 weeks was no better than relaxation exercises (61 people). Two years on, the 82 of 133 treated people who replied had no less pain than before treatment, though they said the effect had lasted about 9 months on average.
Sources 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 6
Low back painMixed evidence
In 11 trials of 921 people, cupping eased pain by the end of treatment, but not 1 month or 3 to 6 months later, and dry cupping on its own wasn't clearly better. Against sham, 8 weekly sessions made no worthwhile difference. Wet cupping beat no treatment in 80 people for at least 2 weeks after treatment, with no sham group, and in 110 people both pulsating and low-pressure cupping beat paracetamol alone.
Sources 7, 5, 39, 31
Heel painEmerging evidence
Added to stretching in 71 people with heel pain, cupping on the calf eased pain about 2 points out of 10 more at the session. The 2023 US physiotherapy guideline for heel pain says that difference had gone 2 days later, though the trial itself reports a larger fall in morning pain at 2 days. In 29 people, cupping did as well as electrical stimulation over 4 weeks. There are no sham-controlled trials. Stretching the sole and calf has stronger support: the guideline's top grade, for short- and long-term pain.
Sources 40, 41, 42
Athletes and recoveryEmerging evidence
A review of 11 trials in 498 athletes, mostly against no treatment and none reporting safety, couldn't recommend cupping either way. In 81 recreational runners, 5 minutes of cupping on the thighs after a run did no better than a sham treatment for soreness, tiredness, recovery or jumping over 3 days.
Sources 43, 44