Calculator

Calorie calculator: how many calories you need a day

Enter your sex, age, height, weight and how active you are, and this calculator estimates your resting energy, or basal metabolic rate (BMR), with the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, and your daily calories, or total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), using physical activity levels (PALs) measured in real people rather than guessed multipliers. It shows the other main equations alongside, the NHS advice on cutting calories, and how far out an estimate can be. Use the result as a starting point: your weight over the next few weeks is the real test.

Work out your calories per day

Enter your sex, age, height and weight, in centimetres and kilograms, feet and stones, or feet and pounds, and choose how active you are. You can also add a body fat percentage, pick another equation, give your family background and choose a goal, and tick a box if you're pregnant, breastfeeding, or take insulin, a diabetes tablet or a weight-loss medicine.

About an hour of walking a day, or on your feet for part of the day; close to the UK average. These levels come from studies that measured daily energy use.

More options

Adds the lean-mass equation.

Calories a day to keep your weight steady

2,750kcal

Many people's true figure is within about 10% of this (2,450 to 3,000 kcal), but the wrong activity level can put you outside it. Resting energy (BMR): 1,720 kcal (7,190 kJ).

See every formula
EquationBMR× 1.6
Mifflin-St Jeor (1990)Within 10% for the most people in independent tests.1,7202,750
Henry (Oxford, 2005)The UK reference, used by SACN.1,7302,780
Harris-Benedict (1919)The original; it ran about 5% high in Mifflin's study.1,7902,860
Roza-Shizgal (1984)The 1984 refit of Harris-Benedict.1,7902,860
Schofield (WHO/FAO)Tends to run high in many populations.1,7902,870

The US 2023 reference equations, fitted to measured daily energy use, give 2,600 kcal (inactive), 2,820 kcal (low active), 3,000 kcal (active), 3,360 kcal (very active). They're typically 250 to 340 kcal a day out for one person.

This is an estimate. Weigh yourself once a week for 2 to 4 weeks: if your weight is steady, you've found your figure; if not, adjust by about 100 to 200 kcal. The NHS average is 2,000 kcal for women and 2,500 for men.

The short version

Resting energy first

The calculator starts with Mifflin-St Jeor: for women, 10 × weight in kg + 6.25 × height in cm - 5 × age - 161; for men, the same + 5. It was built from 498 healthy adults aged 19 to 78, nearly half of them with obesity, and independent reviews find it within 10% of measured resting energy for more people than the other common equations.

Sources 1, 2, 3, 4

For one person it can be 10% out

In 337 adults, Mifflin-St Jeor was within 10% for 82%: 87% of those without obesity and 75% of those with it. In healthy older adults, no equation was both accurate and precise. So the result comes with a range, and your weight over a few weeks is the real check.

Sources 4, 5, 6

Activity from measured studies, not 1.2 to 1.9

Studies that measured daily energy use put the typical UK adult at 1.63 times their BMR, with a quarter below 1.49 and a quarter above 1.78. The common 1.2 multiplier is the level of someone confined to a bed or chair, so the calculator uses four levels from 1.4 to 2.0, based on those measurements, instead.

Sources 7, 8, 9, 10

The NHS averages are 2,000 and 2,500

The NHS says an average woman needs about 2,000 kilocalories (kcal) a day and an average man about 2,500. The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition's (SACN's) reference values vary by age: 2,175 kcal for women aged 19 to 34 and 2,629 for men aged 35 to 44, for example.

Sources 11, 12, 7

To lose weight, about 600 kcal less

The NHS suggests eating about 600 kcal a day less and aiming to lose 0.5 to 1 kg a week. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) sets no fixed deficit, and keeps diets of 800 to 1,200 kcal a day for specialist services with support, so the calculator never shows a target below 1,200.

Sources 13, 12, 14, 15

Weight loss slows

In a validated model, a cut of 480 kcal a day takes a 100 kg man to a plateau about 25 kg lighter over several years, half of it in the first year; the 3,500-calories-per-pound rule predicts about twice as much in year one. The body's own slowing is usually small. So the calculator gives calories, not a date or a weight.

Sources 16, 17, 18

How the calculator works

Step 1: your resting energy

Your basal metabolic rate (BMR) is the energy your body uses at rest. It's usually 45 to 70% of the energy adults use in a day. The calculator works it out from your sex, age, height and weight with the equation you choose, and shows it to the nearest 10 kcal, with kilojoules (kJ; 1 kcal is 4.184 kJ).

The equations were built with sex as recorded in the studies. If you're not sure which fits your body, try both (our suggestion).

Sources 9, 1, 19, 7

The default: Mifflin-St Jeor (1990)

Written as the authors simplified it, with weight in kg, height in cm and age in years. Their full version is "REE = 9.99 x weight + 6.25 x height - 4.92 x age + 166 x sex (males, 1; females, 0) - 161", where REE is resting energy expenditure, and they say simplifying it "did not affect its predictive value"; the two differ by 1 to 4 kcal a day in our examples (our arithmetic). It was built from resting energy measured in 498 healthy adults (247 women and 251 men) aged 19 to 78, 264 of them in the normal weight range and 234 with obesity.

  • Women: 10 × weight + 6.25 × height - 5 × age - 161
  • Men: 10 × weight + 6.25 × height - 5 × age + 5

Source 1

The other equations

You can pick any of these instead, and "See every formula" under the result shows them all. Weight in kg, height in cm, age in years, results in kcal a day:

  • Harris-Benedict (1919), the original: men 66.4730 + 13.7516 × weight + 5.0033 × height - 6.7550 × age; women 655.0955 + 9.5634 × weight + 1.8496 × height - 4.6756 × age. From 136 men and 103 women "in presumably good health", measured 12 to 14 hours after their last meal; their tables cover 25 to 125 kg, 151 to 200 cm and ages 21 to 70.
  • Roza-Shizgal (1984), a refit of Harris-Benedict: men 88.362 + 13.397 × weight + 4.799 × height - 5.677 × age; women 447.593 + 9.247 × weight + 3.098 × height - 4.330 × age. From Harris and Benedict's 239 people plus 98 more, 337 in all; the authors found the original predicted a normal person's resting energy "with a precision of 14%".
  • Henry (Oxford, 2005), the UK reference that SACN uses: by sex and age band, from weight and height in metres (below).
  • Schofield, as the Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization and United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) print it: by sex and age band, from weight only (below).
  • Lean mass (Cunningham 1991), offered once you enter a body fat percentage: 370 + 21.6 × fat-free mass in kg, where fat-free mass is weight × (1 - body fat % ÷ 100). Calculators often call it Katch-McArdle.

Sources 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 7, 9, 27

Henry's equations

As SACN prints them (Table 18), in megajoules (MJ) a day, with weight in kg and height in metres. The calculator converts to kcal at 4.184 kJ per kcal.

  • Men 18 to 30: 0.0600 × weight + 1.31 × height + 0.473
  • Men 30 to 60: 0.0476 × weight + 2.26 × height - 0.574
  • Men over 60: 0.0478 × weight + 2.26 × height - 1.070
  • Women 18 to 30: 0.0433 × weight + 2.57 × height - 1.180
  • Women 30 to 60: 0.0342 × weight + 2.1 × height - 0.0486
  • Women over 60: 0.0356 × weight + 1.76 × height + 0.0448

Sources 7, 26

Schofield's equations

As FAO/WHO/UNU print them (Table 5.2) and SACN repeats them for adults, in kcal a day from weight in kg, with each equation's standard error in brackets:

  • Men 18 to 30: 15.057 × weight + 692.2 (153 kcal)
  • Men 30 to 60: 11.472 × weight + 873.1 (167 kcal)
  • Men 60 and over: 11.711 × weight + 587.7 (164 kcal)
  • Women 18 to 30: 14.818 × weight + 486.6 (119 kcal)
  • Women 30 to 60: 8.126 × weight + 845.6 (111 kcal)
  • Women 60 and over: 9.082 × weight + 658.5 (108 kcal)

Sources 9, 7

Reprints, typos and age bands

Some copies of these equations differ, so this is what we used:

  • Roza-Shizgal: four open papers print the same coefficients, and one prints the women's age term as "4330 × age", a missing decimal point. We couldn't open the 1984 paper itself.
  • Cunningham 1991: the abstract prints "REE = 370 +/- 21.6 x FFM"; every copy we found uses a plus, as we do. Cunningham's 1980 version was 500 + 22 × lean body mass. We couldn't open the Katch and McArdle textbooks the popular name comes from.
  • Henry: SACN also prints kcal coefficients, but they're rounded from the MJ ones, so we use the MJ form; the two differ by 1 to 5 kcal a day in our examples (our arithmetic).
  • Schofield: SACN notes that the FAO/WHO/UNU values differ slightly from the modified versions Henry quotes. We use FAO/WHO/UNU's.
  • Age bands: Henry's and Schofield's bands overlap at 30 and 60, so under 30 uses the 18 to 30 equation, 30 to 59 the 30 to 60 one, and 60 and over the oldest (our choice). Both jump at the edges: for a woman of 165 cm and 63 kg, Henry gives about 52 kcal less at 30 than at 29 (our arithmetic). Mifflin-St Jeor and Harris-Benedict change smoothly with age.

Sources 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 7, 26

Step 2: how active you are

Daily calories = BMR × your physical activity level (PAL): your total daily energy use divided by your BMR, as measured with doubly labelled water. Your usual exercise is part of your level, so don't add exercise calories on top.

The four levels use the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA's) values, with examples from the US 2023 reference report to describe them (the descriptions are ours):

  • Mostly sitting, 1.4: a desk job or mostly at home; daily tasks and short walks, no regular exercise.
  • Lightly active, 1.6, the default: about an hour of walking a day, or on your feet for part of the day; close to the UK average of 1.63.
  • Active, 1.8: on your feet most of the day, or exercise most days on top of walking.
  • Very active, 2.0: hard physical work, or 2 hours or more of hard exercise a day.

Sources 9, 10, 29, 7

Why not the 1.2 to 1.9 multipliers

Many calculators multiply BMR by 1.2, 1.375, 1.55, 1.725 or 1.9. We couldn't trace that ladder to a study: a 2022 paper cites Mifflin's 1990 paper for it, but that paper's abstract has no activity factors, and a 2026 study that uses two of the steps cites a review that doesn't give them. The steps are evenly spaced, with 1.375 halfway between 1.2 and 1.55 and 1.725 halfway between 1.55 and 1.9 (our arithmetic), so it looks like a convention.

It also sits low against the measurements. About 1.2 is the level of people confined to a bed or chair, SACN says 1.38 "seems the likely lower limit for free-living individuals", and FAO/WHO/UNU's own example treats 1.55 as sedentary, where the ladder calls it moderate. For someone at the UK's 25th centile, 1.49, using 1.2 gives an answer about a fifth too low (1.2 ÷ 1.49 = 0.81; our arithmetic).

Sources 30, 1, 31, 32, 8, 29, 7, 9

Step 3: the result

Your BMR to the nearest 10 kcal, with kJ, and your daily calories to keep your weight steady, also to the nearest 10 kcal, with a range rounded to the nearest 50 kcal: many people's true figure is within about 10% of it. The range reflects validation studies, where about 8 in 10 people were within 10% of their measured resting energy, and the US equations' average error of about 9%. It's a typical range, not a guarantee, and the wrong activity level can put you outside it (our choice). The NHS averages, 2,000 kcal for women and 2,500 for men, sit underneath.

Every result says it's an estimate: weigh yourself once a week for 2 to 4 weeks, and if your weight is steady you've found your figure; if not, adjust by about 100 to 200 kcal. That's the US report's approach of checking your weight and adjusting; the step size is our choice.

Sources 4, 33, 5, 29, 12

Goals and ticks

Lose weight: your daily figure minus 600 kcal, never below 1,200, with the NHS aim of 0.5 to 1 kg a week and a reminder that loss slows. It's offered only if your body mass index (BMI) is 25 or more, or 23 or more if you choose one of the backgrounds NICE lists (South Asian, Chinese, other Asian, Middle Eastern, Black African or African-Caribbean), because that's where NICE's overweight range starts; otherwise the page says why. Gain weight: plus 300 to 500 kcal, offered at a BMI under 18.5.

Pregnant: guidance instead of numbers. Breastfeeding a baby under 6 months who has only breast milk: your figure plus 330 kcal, with no weight-loss line. Insulin or a diabetes tablet such as gliclazide: a warning about low blood sugar. A weight-loss medicine: a note to keep up strength training and enough protein. Choose to lose or gain weight and you'll also see where to get help with eating disorders.

Under 18 the calculator stops, because the equations are for adults. From 80 it notes that fewer people that age were in the studies: Mifflin's oldest was 78.

Sources 13, 12, 14, 34, 35, 7, 36, 37, 1

The US 2023 equations

"See every formula" also gives the US National Academies' 2023 equations, which predict daily energy use directly from age (years), height (cm), weight (kg) and an activity category: inactive (a PAL under 1.53), low active (1.53 to 1.68), active (1.68 to 1.85) or very active (1.85 to 2.50). They were fitted to doubly labelled water measurements in about 5,600 adults, and for one person they were out by 9.4% (men) and 8.7% (women) on average, with typical errors of 339 and 246 kcal a day.

The report's own example, a woman of 22, 165 cm and 63 kg who is low active, comes to "2,275 kcal/day"; the calculator gets 2,275.37 before rounding, shown as 2,280 (our arithmetic).

  • Men, inactive: 753.07 - 10.83 × age + 6.50 × height + 14.10 × weight
  • Men, low active: 581.47 - 10.83 × age + 8.30 × height + 14.94 × weight
  • Men, active: 1,004.82 - 10.83 × age + 6.52 × height + 15.91 × weight
  • Men, very active: -517.88 - 10.83 × age + 15.61 × height + 19.11 × weight
  • Women, inactive: 584.90 - 7.01 × age + 5.72 × height + 11.71 × weight
  • Women, low active: 575.77 - 7.01 × age + 6.60 × height + 12.14 × weight
  • Women, active: 710.25 - 7.01 × age + 6.54 × height + 12.34 × weight
  • Women, very active: 511.83 - 7.01 × age + 9.07 × height + 12.56 × weight

Source 29

Worked examples (our arithmetic)

Rounded as the calculator rounds them. In these examples and the floor example under "Cutting calories safely", Mifflin-St Jeor gave the lowest or second-lowest BMR of the five equations that don't need body fat, and those five spread by 4 to 14%.

  • A man of 40, 178 cm and 80 kg who is lightly active, the calculator's starting values: BMR 1,717.5 kcal, shown as 1,720 kcal (7,190 kJ); × 1.6 = 2,748, shown as 2,750 kcal a day, with a range of 2,450 to 3,000. His BMI is 25.2, so the weight-loss line is offered: about 2,150 kcal. The other equations give BMRs of 1,730 (Henry) and 1,790 (Harris-Benedict, Roza-Shizgal and Schofield), and the US 2023 equations give 2,600 (inactive) to 3,360 (very active), with 2,820 for low active.
  • A woman of 22, 165 cm and 63 kg who is lightly active, the US report's example: BMR 1,390 kcal (5,820 kJ); × 1.6 gives 2,220 kcal a day (2,000 to 2,450). The US low active equation gives 2,280. Henry gives the lowest BMR of the five here, 1,380, and Harris-Benedict the highest, 1,460.
  • A woman of 65, 160 cm and 90 kg with 40% body fat, mostly sitting: BMR 1,414, shown as 1,410 kcal; × 1.4 gives 1,980 kcal a day (1,800 to 2,200), and the weight-loss line about 1,380. With 54 kg of fat-free mass, the lean-mass equation gives a BMR of 1,540; the others give 1,450 (Henry), 1,480 (Schofield), 1,490 (Roza-Shizgal) and 1,510 (Harris-Benedict).

Sources 1, 26, 7, 20, 21, 9, 27, 29

What the evidence says

Mifflin-St Jeor has the most consistent recordStrong evidence

A systematic review for the American Dietetic Association found "the Mifflin-St Jeor equation was the most reliable, predicting RMR within 10% of measured in more nonobese and obese individuals than any other equation, and it also had the narrowest error range" (RMR is resting metabolic rate), though older adults and US ethnic minorities were underrepresented. In 130 adults with BMIs from 18.8 to 96.8, it was more than 10% out for 22%, against 33% for Harris-Benedict and 35% for the Owen equation. In 337 adults it was unbiased on average (95% confidence interval -26 to +8 kcal a day), and in 338 US adults with BMIs of 25 to 40 it was within 10% for 79%.

Sources 2, 3, 4, 33

For one person it can be 10% or more outStrong evidence

In 337 community-living adults, Mifflin-St Jeor was within 10% of measured resting energy for 82%: "87 vs. 75%" in people without and with obesity. A review of adults with a BMI of 25 or more found about 75% of its predictions within 10% and errors above 10% in 25%, and concluded that "No single prediction equation provides accurate and precise REE estimates in all obese adults". In Dutch adults with overweight or obesity, "there appears to be no accurate equation".

Sources 4, 5, 33

With obesity, no equation fits everyoneMixed evidence

A 2022 meta-analysis of 61 studies in adults with overweight and obesity found Harris-Benedict the most precise, with 60.65% and 62.54% of predictions within 10%, and Schofield the least biased with overweight; "Equations with body composition data showed the highest biases". During weight loss, Harris-Benedict showed the smallest differences at 3, 6 and 12 months, with wide prediction intervals. An earlier review found Mifflin-St Jeor the most precise at BMIs of 30 and above, and Henry the most accurate at 40 and above.

Sources 38, 39, 5

Older adults and athletesEmerging evidence

In healthy older adults, no equation was both accurate and precise. Mifflin-St Jeor had the least bias (-0.3%) and Harris-Benedict +2.6%, but only about 70% (Harris-Benedict), 65% (Henry) and 61% (Mifflin-St Jeor) of predictions were within 10%. In athletes (29 studies, 1,430 people), Mifflin-St Jeor misestimated resting energy on average, while the lean-mass and Harris-Benedict equations didn't, though results varied widely between studies.

Sources 6, 40

Henry and Schofield, the UK and WHO equationsStrong evidence

Henry's Oxford equations came from 10,552 measurements. They left out the Italian data that made up 47% of Schofield's, added 4,018 people from the tropics, and predict a lower BMR than Schofield's for men aged 18 to 60 and for all women; Henry writes that the FAO/WHO/UNU equations "overestimate BMR in many communities". SACN uses Henry's for UK energy values, though "there does not appear to have been any recent validation within the current UK population". In 767 US adults with measured BMR, Henry was within 10% for 73% and Schofield for 69%. EFSA considers Harris-Benedict, Schofield, Mifflin-St Jeor, Müller and Henry equally valid for healthy European adults.

Sources 26, 7, 9, 10

Activity levels come from measurementsStrong evidence

Doubly labelled water studies measure total energy use in daily life; divided by BMR, that gives the physical activity level. SACN's UK reference is a median of 1.63, with 1.49 and 1.78 at the 25th and 75th centiles. FAO/WHO/UNU class 1.40 to 1.69 as sedentary or light, 1.70 to 1.99 as active and 2.00 to 2.40 as vigorous, and say values above 2.40 "are difficult to maintain over a long period of time". EFSA uses 1.4, 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0, and notes that sustainable lifestyles range "between 1.35 and 2.5". In 574 measurements, the limits of daily energy use were about 1.2 and 4.5 times BMR.

Sources 7, 9, 10, 8

Your own activity level is hard to pin downStrong evidence

The US 2023 report says "a valid, reliable tool does not exist to enable accurate classification of an individual's PAL category", and that the categories "do not correspond to the physical activity guidelines". SACN found that "predictions of PAL values are unlikely to be accurate": in studies classed as light activity, average PALs ranged from 1.23 to 1.98. So if your weight changes at your chosen level, adjust (our suggestion).

Sources 29, 7

The 1.2 to 1.9 multipliers have no traceable sourceMixed evidence

We looked for the origin of 1.2, 1.375, 1.55, 1.725 and 1.9. A 2022 paper gives all five and cites Mifflin 1990, whose abstract has no activity factors; a 2026 study uses 1.375 and 1.725 and cites a 2023 review of athletes that doesn't give them. Not finding a source doesn't prove there isn't one, so we grade this mixed, but the measured values the calculator uses are far better documented (our reading).

Sources 30, 1, 31, 32

Check the estimate against your weightStrong evidence

FAO/WHO/UNU say their energy requirements "are to be applied to population groups and not to individuals". The US 2023 report calls choosing an activity level "the most challenging aspect" of estimating someone's needs, and advises people to "monitor body weight over time" and adjust. Even its own equations, fitted to measured daily energy use, are typically 250 to 340 kcal a day out for one person.

Sources 9, 29, 7

Cutting calories safely

The NHS: about 600 kcal a day lessStrong evidence

NHS Better Health: "To lose weight, you need to eat and drink fewer calories than you do now. Aim to reduce your intake by around 600 calories a day. This is a safe and sustainable way to lose weight." The NHS also advises losing weight steadily, aiming for 0.5 to 1 kg (1 to 2 lb) a week, and says "Just losing a small amount of weight (5 to 10% of your body weight) can improve your health".

Sources 13, 12

NICE: no fixed number, and supportStrong evidence

NICE's 2025 guideline asks for dietary approaches that "keep the person's total energy intake below their energy expenditure (also called an energy deficit or calorie deficit)", offered with support and follow-up. On the size of the cut, its committee found that studies varied: "Many used a 500 to 800 kilocalories a day deficit but it was also common to use an individual deficit for each participant, so they agreed not to specify a particular deficit."

Sources 14, 15

Low-calorie diets need specialist supportStrong evidence

NICE says to consider diets of 800 to 1,200 kcal a day "only as part of a multicomponent overweight and obesity management strategy with long-term support within a specialist overweight and obesity management service", and under 800 kcal only for people with a clinically assessed need to lose weight quickly, such as to make surgery safer. These diets should be nutritionally complete, last no more than 12 weeks and come with ongoing clinical support, and before starting, clinicians should check for eating disorders and review any medicines. The NHS: "Very low calorie diets are not suitable or safe for everyone."

Sources 14, 15, 12

The US guidelineStrong evidence

The 2013 US obesity guideline says to "Prescribe 1200-1500 kcal/d for women and 1500-1800 kcal/d for men (kilocalorie levels are usually adjusted for the individual's body weight)", or "an energy deficit of 500 kcal/d or 750 kcal/d or 30% energy deficit", and keeps diets under 800 kcal for limited circumstances, run by trained practitioners in a medical care setting. The US National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) Body Weight Planner won't set a target below 1,000 kcal a day, because "Food group targets and nutrient recommendations will not be met below 1000 calories/day".

Sources 41, 42

Why the calculator stops at 1,200

Because NICE keeps 800 to 1,200 kcal diets for specialist services, the calculator never shows a weight-loss figure below 1,200 kcal a day (our choice). If 600 kcal less would take you below that, it shows 1,200 and says the cut is smaller, with a pointer to your GP, who can advise on losing weight safely and refer you to weight management programmes. If your daily figure is already 1,200 or less, it shows no weight-loss figure at all, only the pointer to your GP.

An example (our arithmetic): a woman of 60, 150 cm and 60 kg (BMI 26.7) who is mostly sitting has a BMR of 1,080 kcal and a daily figure of about 1,510. Taking off 600 would leave about 910, so the calculator shows 1,200, a cut of about 310 kcal.

Sources 14, 12, 1

Gaining weightStrong evidence

For adults who need to gain weight, the NHS says they "could try adding around 300 to 500 extra calories a day". See a GP if you've lost weight suddenly or without changing your diet or exercise routine, or if you "use the control of food to cope with feelings". The calculator offers this line at a BMI under 18.5.

Source 35

Why weight loss slows

A lighter body uses lessStrong evidence

For an average adult with overweight, Hall's validated model found that "every change of energy intake of 100 kJ per day will lead to an eventual bodyweight change of about 1 kg (equivalently, 10 kcal per day per pound of weight change) with half of the weight change being achieved in about 1 year and 95% of the weight change in about 3 years". As you lose weight you need less energy, so the same intake brings slower and slower loss until your weight settles.

Source 16

Hall's exampleStrong evidence

A 100 kg sedentary man who eats 2 MJ (about 480 kcal) a day less settles "at about 75 kg", "taking roughly 1 year to reach half of the maximum weight loss and reaching 95% of this value after about 3 years". The static rule predicted "22 kg lost in the first year", which Hall calls "about 100% greater weight loss than our model prediction".

The paper named the NHS among sources that wrongly said a cut of about 2 MJ a day would bring slow and steady loss of about 0.5 kg a week. So read today's NHS aim of 0.5 to 1 kg a week as an aim, not a forecast (our reading).

Source 16

The 3,500-calorie ruleStrong evidence

The rule that a pound of fat is 3,500 kcal, so a 500 kcal daily cut loses a pound a week, "grossly overestimates actual weight loss" in seven tightly controlled studies. It roughly matches the energy in weight lost by people starting with more than 30 kg of body fat, but overestimates the deficit needed for each kilo lost by people with less.

Sources 17, 43

The body adapts, usually a littleMixed evidence

In 71 people with obesity eating 1,000 kcal a day for 8 weeks, resting energy was 92 kcal a day below prediction, fell to 38 after 4 weeks at a stable weight, and "metabolic adaptation does not predict weight regain". After extreme weight loss on a television competition, 14 people had regained 41 of their 58 kg six years later, yet their resting energy was still 499 kcal a day below prediction.

Sources 18, 44

Eating less does most of the weight lossStrong evidence

NHS Better Health: "Changing what you eat can help you lose weight, but moving more can help you keep the weight off." Our exercise for weight loss guide explains what exercise does well.

Source 45

If you want a forecast

This calculator doesn't turn calories into a date or a weight (our choice). The NIH Body Weight Planner runs a dynamic model of weight change, with activity levels from 1.4 to 2.5, and isn't for under-18s or for use in pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Source 42

The UK reference values

The NHS averagesStrong evidence

The NHS: "an average man needs 2,500kcal a day; an average woman needs 2,000kcal a day", and this "could be different based on your: age, weight, height, how much exercise you do". Food labels use a reference intake of 8,400 kJ (2,000 kcal) for an average adult.

Sources 11, 12, 46

SACN's estimated average requirementsStrong evidence

SACN's reference values for UK adults at a BMI of 22.5, average heights and a PAL of 1.63, in kcal a day (Table 16):

  • Men 19 to 24: 2,772; 25 to 34: 2,749; 35 to 44: 2,629; 45 to 54 and 55 to 64: 2,581; 65 to 74: 2,342; 75 and over: 2,294
  • Women 19 to 24 and 25 to 34: 2,175; 35 to 44 and 45 to 54: 2,103; 55 to 64: 2,079; 65 to 74: 1,912; 75 and over: 1,840

Source 7

Why the official figures are cappedStrong evidence

The government's dietary recommendations take SACN's values but cap them "at 10.5 MJ (2500kcal)/day for males and 8.4MJ (2000kcal)/day for females to help address issues of overweight and obesity": 2,500 and 2,000 kcal at 19 to 64, 2,342 and 1,912 at 65 to 74, and 2,294 and 1,840 from 75.

Source 47

What the averages mean for you

They're averages for groups. Your own figure depends on your size, age and activity, and can sit well above or below them: the calculator's starting example, a lightly active man of 40 who weighs 80 kg, comes out at 2,750 kcal (our arithmetic).

Sources 9, 1

Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Pregnancy: guidance, not numbersStrong evidence

The NHS says you don't need extra calories for most of pregnancy: "In the final 3 months of your pregnancy, you'll need an extra 200 calories a day", and "even if you are expecting twins or more, you don't need to eat extra portions". Pregnancy "isn't the time to go on a diet", and with obesity, "do not try to lose weight during your pregnancy". SACN adds 191 kcal a day in the last trimester, noting that women who are overweight at the start "may not require this increment", and NICE asks professionals to reassure people "that they do not need to 'eat for two'". So with "I'm pregnant" ticked, the calculator shows this guidance and no figure.

Sources 48, 49, 50, 7, 51

Breastfeeding: about 330 kcal moreStrong evidence

SACN adds 330 kcal a day for the first 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding. Other bodies allow more: the US 2023 report counts about 540 kcal for the milk, less 140 from body stores, and EFSA and FAO/WHO/UNU about 500. The NHS: "You do not need to follow a special diet while you're breastfeeding." With the breastfeeding box ticked, the calculator adds 330 kcal to your daily figure and shows no weight-loss line.

Sources 7, 29, 10, 9, 52

Help with feeding

The National Breastfeeding Helpline is on 0300 100 0212. Our guides to exercise in pregnancy and after giving birth cover moving safely.

Source 52

Who it isn't for

Under 18

The equations are for adults, so the calculator stops. NICE says children's diets should keep intake "at or below the recommended daily calorie intake for their age and sex", and to "Focus on healthy eating rather than on overly restrictive diets". For children and teenagers, the NHS uses a BMI calculator that compares them with others of the same age and sex.

Sources 14, 53

During pregnancy

No figure is shown, only the guidance above: don't diet, and expect to need about 200 extra kcal a day only in the last 3 months. Ask your midwife if you're worried about your weight.

Sources 48, 51

While breastfeeding

The calculator adds 330 kcal for the first 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding, and shows no weight-loss figure.

Sources 7, 52

If you have, or have had, an eating disorder

These numbers aren't the right tool. The calculator shows where to get help whenever you choose to lose or gain weight, and never shows a weight-loss figure below a BMI of 25 (23 for NICE's listed backgrounds). In 493 students, using calorie-counting and fitness-tracking apps went with more eating concern and dietary restraint, and NICE asks clinicians to offer assessment and counselling for possible eating disorders before low-calorie diets. The support section below has the numbers.

Sources 54, 55, 56, 14

Insulin, gliclazide or glimepiride

The NHS says low blood sugar "is common if you take insulin. It can also happen with some other diabetes medicines, such as gliclazide and glimepiride", for example if you miss or delay meals or don't eat enough carbohydrate. Know Diabetes warns that very low-calorie plans "could significantly increase the risk of hypos" with insulin or sulphonylureas such as gliclazide, and NICE asks clinicians to review medicines before low-calorie diets. Talk to your diabetes team before cutting calories.

Sources 36, 57, 58, 14

On a weight-loss medicine

The NHS: "You'll need to eat a balanced diet with fewer calories and do regular physical activity while taking them." A 2025 advisory from four US obesity and nutrition societies puts protein and strength training first, because "increased protein intake alone is likely inadequate to support the preservation of muscle mass in the absence of structured resistance/strength training". The protein calculator covers how much.

Sources 12, 37

A medical condition or a special diet

NHS Better Health advises talking to a GP or another healthcare professional first.

Source 13

Underweight, or losing weight without trying

See a GP if you've lost weight suddenly or without trying. The calculator offers a gain line at a BMI under 18.5.

Source 35

Confined to a bed or chair, or very ill

Daily energy use can fall to about 1.2 times BMR, below the calculator's lowest level, and Roza and Shizgal found Harris-Benedict "unreliable in the malnourished patient". Ask your care team or a dietitian.

Sources 8, 7, 21

80 and over

The studies behind the equations included few people this age (Mifflin's oldest was 78), and in older adults fewer predictions fell within 10%, so the calculator adds a note and the estimate is less certain.

Sources 1, 6

Common myths

"Sedentary means multiply by 1.2"Strong evidence

1.2 is the floor, seen in people confined to a bed or chair. Free-living adults rarely fall below about 1.38, and the UK median is 1.63.

Sources 8, 29, 7

"Cut 3,500 calories and you lose a pound"Strong evidence

The rule "grossly overestimates actual weight loss", because weight loss slows as your body gets lighter and settles towards a plateau.

Sources 17, 16

"A calculator tells you exactly what you burn"Strong evidence

Even the best equation is more than 10% out for about 1 in 5 people, and for more with obesity or in older age. FAO/WHO/UNU say their requirements "are to be applied to population groups and not to individuals".

Sources 4, 5, 6, 9

"Eat too little and starvation mode stops weight loss"Mixed evidence

The body's own slowing averaged under 100 kcal a day during dieting and halved once weight was stable, though it was larger after extreme weight loss. Weight loss slows mainly because a smaller body uses less energy.

Sources 18, 44, 16

"Your metabolism crashes in your 30s and 40s"Strong evidence

In 6,421 people, energy use adjusted for body size was stable from 20 to 60 and fell about 0.7% a year after 60.

Source 59

"1,200 calories is right for every woman"Strong evidence

The US guideline's 1,200 to 1,500 kcal for women is a weight-loss prescription "usually adjusted for the individual's body weight". NICE keeps 800 to 1,200 kcal diets for specialist services, and the NHS bases the cut on what you eat now.

Sources 41, 14, 13

"Building muscle will massively raise your metabolism"Strong evidence

A kilo of muscle uses about 13 kcal a day at rest and a kilo of fat about 4.5, so 2 kg more muscle adds about 26 kcal a day (our arithmetic).

Source 60

If you're worried about your weight or eating

Eating disorders

If you have, or think you might have, an eating disorder, these numbers aren't the right tool. See a GP as soon as you can, or talk in confidence to the eating disorder charity Beat: 0808 801 0677 (England), 0808 801 0432 (Scotland), 0808 801 0433 (Wales) or 0808 801 0434 (Northern Ireland). Beat's helplines are open 3pm to 8pm, Monday to Friday, and it also offers web chat and email. If you or someone else is in immediate danger, call 999 or Samaritans on 116 123; for medical advice, contact your GP or call 111.

Sources 54, 55

If you take diabetes medicines

If you take insulin, or a tablet such as gliclazide or glimepiride, eating less can cause low blood sugar (a hypo). Talk to your diabetes care team before cutting calories, and don't skip or delay meals.

Sources 36, 57, 58

NHS help with weight

A GP can give you advice about losing weight safely and refer you for treatment, including weight management programmes, medicines and surgery. You may be able to refer yourself to local NHS weight management services without seeing a GP: check your GP surgery's website or ask reception, or search online for NHS weight management services near you.

Source 12

Goals that aren't numbers

If calorie numbers make you anxious, set goals for health and strength instead, such as walking further or lifting a little more (our suggestion, as in our exercise for weight loss guide).

Workouts to try

Moving more helps you keep weight off, whatever your goal. A walk after meals and steady cardio are easy places to start; the strength and home workouts add the muscle work.

Questions people ask

How many calories do I need a day?

The NHS says an average woman needs about 2,000 kcal a day and an average man about 2,500, but your figure depends on your size, age and activity. A 35-year-old woman who is 168 cm, weighs 70 kg and walks about an hour a day comes out at about 2,260 kcal on this calculator. Weigh yourself for a few weeks to check it.

What is the difference between BMR and TDEE?

BMR (basal metabolic rate) is the energy you use at rest; TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) adds everything else you do, from walking to digesting food. BMR is usually 45 to 70% of the total. The calculator works out TDEE as BMR × your physical activity level, which is about 1.6 for a typical UK adult.

Which BMR formula is most accurate?

Mifflin-St Jeor has the best record across people with and without obesity: in one study of 337 adults it was within 10% for about 8 in 10. No formula is right for everyone, and in older adults and people with obesity more people fall outside 10%. The UK's nutrition committee uses the Henry equations, and the "Katch-McArdle" formula on many sites is Cunningham's 1991 lean-mass equation, which you can use here by adding your body fat percentage.

How many calories should I eat to lose weight?

The NHS suggests about 600 kcal a day less than you need to keep your weight steady, aiming to lose 0.5 to 1 kg a week. NICE keeps diets of 800 to 1,200 kcal a day for specialist services with support, so this calculator never goes below 1,200, and it shows a weight-loss figure only if your BMI is 25 or more (23 for some backgrounds). If you have a medical condition or an eating disorder, talk to your GP first.

Is 3,500 calories really a pound of fat?

Not in practice. Your body uses less energy as you get lighter, so weight loss slows: in one validated model, a 480 kcal daily cut takes a 100 kg man about 25 kg lighter over several years, roughly half of it in the first year, where the 3,500-calorie rule predicts 22 kg in year one. That's why this calculator doesn't turn calories into kilos or dates.

Why has my weight loss slowed down?

Mostly because a lighter body burns less. In a study of people on 1,000 kcal a day, resting energy ran about 90 kcal a day below prediction while they were losing weight, and less once their weight was steady. Keep the habits going: eating less does most of the weight loss, and moving more helps keep it off.

What activity level should I pick?

Mostly sitting with short walks is 1.4; an hour of walking a day, or a job partly on your feet, is about 1.6, close to the UK average. Choose 1.8 if you're on your feet most of the day or exercise most days, and 2.0 for hard physical work or long daily training. If you're between two, pick one and check your weight over a few weeks.

Should I eat back the calories from exercise?

Not on top of this figure: your activity level already includes your usual exercise, so adding it again counts it twice. If you take up a new activity, our calories burned calculator estimates its cost, and its page explains why watch figures are often well out.

Does metabolism slow down with age?

Less than people think. In 6,421 people, energy use adjusted for body size was stable from 20 to 60 and fell about 0.7% a year after 60. So before 60, changes in your needs come mainly from changes in your size, muscle and activity, and strength training helps you keep muscle.

How many extra calories do I need when pregnant or breastfeeding?

None in the first 6 months of pregnancy, then about 200 a day in the last 3 months (NHS), and you shouldn't try to lose weight while pregnant, so the calculator shows guidance rather than a number. When breastfeeding there's no special diet; UK reference values add about 330 kcal a day for the first 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding, which the calculator adds when you tick the box.

Sources

  1. Mifflin 1990 · A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in 498 healthy adults (study, Am J Clin Nutr)
  2. Frankenfield 2005 · Predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults (systematic review, J Am Diet Assoc)
  3. Frankenfield 2003 · Validation of resting metabolic rate equations in 130 obese and nonobese people (study, J Am Diet Assoc)
  4. Frankenfield 2013 · Bias and accuracy of resting metabolic rate equations in 337 non-obese and obese adults (study, Clin Nutr)
  5. Madden 2016 · Prediction equations for energy expenditure in adults with overweight and obesity (systematic review, J Hum Nutr Diet)
  6. Cioffi 2021 · Predicting resting energy expenditure in healthy older adults (systematic review, Clin Nutr)
  7. SACN 2011 · Dietary reference values for energy (Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition report)
  8. Black 1996 · Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: 574 doubly labelled water measurements (analysis, Eur J Clin Nutr)
  9. FAO/WHO/UNU 2004 · Human energy requirements (report of a joint expert consultation)
  10. EFSA 2017 · Dietary reference values for nutrients: summary report (European Food Safety Authority)
  11. NHS · Understanding calories
  12. NHS · Overweight and obesity in adults
  13. NHS Better Health · Calories and weight loss
  14. NICE NG246 · Overweight and obesity management: physical activity and diet (2025, updated January 2026)
  15. NICE NG246 · Rationale and impact: dietary approaches and low-energy diets
  16. Hall 2011 · Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight (modelling study, Lancet)
  17. Thomas 2013 · Can a 3,500-calorie deficit take off a pound a week? A commentary on the rule (Int J Obes)
  18. Martins 2020 · Metabolic adaptation in 71 people with obesity during and after weight loss (study, Am J Clin Nutr)
  19. Harris and Benedict 1918 · A biometric study of human basal metabolism (PNAS)
  20. Harris and Benedict 1919 · A biometric study of basal metabolism in man (Carnegie Institution monograph)
  21. Roza 1984 · The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass (study, Am J Clin Nutr)
  22. Pavlidou 2023 · Revised Harris-Benedict equation, reprinting the Roza-Shizgal equations (study, Metabolites)
  23. Chmielewska 2023 · Resting metabolic rate equations in sport climbers, reprinting the Roza-Shizgal equations (study, IJERPH)
  24. Park 2020 · Predicting resting metabolic rate in Korean adults, reprinting the Roza-Shizgal equations (study, Phys Act Nutr)
  25. Romanelli 2025 · Resting energy equations in critically ill patients, reprinting the Roza-Shizgal equations (study, Acute Crit Care)
  26. Henry 2005 · Basal metabolic rate studies in humans: measurement and development of new equations (the Oxford equations, Public Health Nutr)
  27. Cunningham 1991 · Body composition as a determinant of energy expenditure, with a proposed general prediction equation (synthetic review, Am J Clin Nutr)
  28. Cunningham 1980 · A reanalysis of the factors influencing basal metabolic rate in normal adults (Am J Clin Nutr)
  29. NASEM 2023 · Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy (US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report)
  30. Busgang 2022 · My nutrition index, which uses the 1.2 to 1.9 activity factors and cites Mifflin 1990 for them (methods paper, BMC Nutr)
  31. Woronyczová 2026 · Low energy availability in Czech female endurance athletes, using activity factors of 1.375 and 1.725 (study, Front Sports Act Living)
  32. Martinho 2023 · Predicting resting energy expenditure among athletes (systematic review, Biol Sport)
  33. Weijs 2008 · Predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in US and Dutch adults with overweight and obesity (study, Am J Clin Nutr)
  34. NICE NG246 · Identifying and assessing overweight, obesity and central adiposity, including lower BMI thresholds
  35. NHS · Healthy ways to gain weight
  36. NHS · Low blood sugar (hypoglycaemia)
  37. Mozaffarian 2025 · Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity (joint advisory of four US societies, Am J Lifestyle Med)
  38. Macena 2022 · Resting and total energy equations in adults with overweight and obesity: 61 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, Nutr Rev)
  39. de Lima Macena 2023 · Resting energy equations during weight loss in people with excess weight (systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin Nutr ESPEN)
  40. O'Neill 2023 · Accuracy of resting metabolic rate equations in athletes: 29 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, Sports Medicine)
  41. Jensen 2014 · 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults (US guideline, Circulation)
  42. NIDDK · Body Weight Planner (US National Institutes of Health)
  43. Hall 2008 · What energy deficit does each unit of weight loss need? (analysis, Int J Obes)
  44. Fothergill 2016 · Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after "The Biggest Loser" competition, in 14 people (study, Obesity)
  45. NHS Better Health · How to lose weight
  46. Regulation (EU) 1169/2011 · Annex XIII: reference intakes for food labels (as it applies in the UK)
  47. Public Health England 2016 · Government Dietary Recommendations for energy and nutrients
  48. NHS Best Start in Life · Healthy eating in pregnancy
  49. NHS · Weight gain in pregnancy
  50. NHS · Overweight and pregnant
  51. NICE NG247 · Maternal and child nutrition: recommendations (2025)
  52. NHS · Breastfeeding and diet
  53. NHS · Advice for parents of overweight children
  54. NHS · Eating disorders: overview
  55. Beat · Helplines and support
  56. Simpson 2017 · Calorie counting and fitness tracking and eating disorder symptoms in 493 students (study, Eat Behav)
  57. NHS · Gliclazide
  58. Know Diabetes · Very low calorie diets
  59. Pontzer 2021 · Daily energy expenditure through the human life course, in 6,421 people (study, Science)
  60. Wang 2010 · Specific metabolic rates of major organs and tissues across adulthood (study, Am J Clin Nutr)

Estimates for healthy adults, not a personal prescription or a diagnosis, and clinical review of these pages is pending. Check with a GP before hard training or testing a maximum if you have a heart condition, high blood pressure, chest pain, dizziness or breathlessness when active, and stop for sharp or increasing pain. Health disclaimer.