Non-surgical care first for mostEmerging evidence
Non-surgical care is the first treatment for most lesions: less physical activity and weight-bearing, physiotherapy and insoles, with about 50% success in the studies one review summarised, and 45% in the pooled review above.
In children, the published protocols used about 6 weeks of immobilisation (3 to 8), in a cast in some studies, then about 5 months (4 to 6) of restricted weight-bearing and sport, and 44% of 192 lesions did well. Lesions causing few symptoms didn't worsen over 4 to 6 years whether or not activity was restricted. No trial has compared different non-surgical approaches.
Sources 7, 16, 19, 17, 18
Rehab: no trials, so NHS protocols set the shapeEmerging evidence
No trial has tested exercise for these lesions. NHS protocols after surgery set a shape that non-surgical rehab can borrow: movement first, then strength (heel raises from two legs to one), balance and reach, then impact only once criteria are met.
One NHS trust's criteria before impact are full ankle movement without pain or swelling, an even forwards and backwards reach on each leg on the star excursion balance test, 10 leg presses at body weight, 10 good single-leg squats and 25 pain-free single-leg heel raises, with sport-specific training 4 to 6 weeks after running starts. A review of 227 articles found rehab plans after surgery vary widely and are mostly based on time rather than criteria. The plan below uses the criteria as its stage gates.
Two pieces are borrowed from ankle instability trials and labelled: the heel-raise progression off a step comes from a trial in 39 people with unstable ankles, and the advice to keep balance work going comes from a trial in 522 athletes, where an 8-week home balance programme after a sprain cut repeat sprains from 33% to 22% over a year.
Sources 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
Surgery: marrow stimulation (microfracture)Emerging evidence
For lesions that keep causing symptoms despite non-surgical care, NHS England describes the first operations as clearing the damaged area, with or without drilling or microfracture of the bone underneath, or bone grafting, and more complex resurfacing only if those fail. Marrow stimulation means clearing the damaged area and making small holes in the bone so that healing cells fill the defect with repair tissue.
In adults with first-time lesions, a review of 52 studies found pooled success of 82% in 317 ankles after marrow stimulation, and no operation better than another; an earlier review found 85% success across 18 treatment groups. In 50 people followed for 8 to 20 years (12 on average), 78% had a good or excellent result, 94% had gone back to work and 88% to sport, and arthritis had progressed one grade in a third.
The repair tissue is fibrocartilage, which bears weight less well than the original cartilage and may wear over time, a review in children explains. The trial evidence is thin: a Cochrane review found only one small trial, of 15 people.
Sources 1, 7, 25, 26, 27, 19, 28
Lesion size, and other operationsEmerging evidence
Larger lesions do less well with marrow stimulation. In 120 ankles, lesions of 150 mm² or more failed in 80% (20 of 25), and a review of 25 studies suggests marrow stimulation suits lesions under about 107 mm² or 10 mm across. Larger lesions, or ones that don't heal, may need grafts of bone and cartilage or other resurfacing.
In children, a review found success in 77% after marrow stimulation, 79% after fixing a loose piece back, 95% after drilling through the bone from below (in 22 lesions) and 67% after grafts (in 9), from small series of mixed quality.
Sources 15, 14, 1, 19
Return to sport and work, and complicationsEmerging evidence
After marrow stimulation, 88% went back to sport at any level and 79% to their previous level, usually 13 to 26 weeks after surgery, across 61 studies of 2,347 lesions. Across 18 studies, 93% went back to work, after 2 to 11 weeks. The studies were of low quality.
Complications happened in about 1 in 20 operations, across 6,962 operated lesions; nerve injury was the commonest, and none was life-threatening.
Sources 29, 30, 31
Weight-bearing after microfracture, and microfracture with ligament repairEmerging evidence
In a randomised trial of 81 ankles with small to mid-sized lesions, putting weight through the foot from 2 weeks gave the same results at about 3 years as 6 weeks without weight. NHS protocols differ: one usually allows weight as tolerated from the start, another touching or partial weight at first, building to full weight from about week 6. So the guide says: as your team allows.
In a trial of 71 people with an unstable ankle and a small cartilage lesion, adding microfracture to ligament reconstruction made no difference to function, pain or complications at 2 years, and recovery was slower.
Sources 32, 20, 21, 33
Cell implants and injections: limited evidenceMixed evidence
NHS England doesn't routinely fund autologous chondrocyte implantation (growing your own cartilage cells and implanting them) for these lesions, because the evidence isn't strong enough. A review found only limited comparative evidence for adding biological treatments to marrow stimulation. In a meta-analysis of 4 trials of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), the pooled gain in ankle function was uncertain (its range included no effect) and results varied widely, though the authors were positive. They're add-ons with uncertain benefit, not cures.
Sources 1, 34, 35